Activity Feedback & Evaluation

If you have been involved in any CDI activity over the last 8 years, we strongly value hearing your thoughts on how it was conducted, how the experience may assist and inform your work today, and what sorts of activities you would like to see CDI undertake in the future. Please let us know which activity you are commenting on and you can email your thoughts directly to cdi@anu.edu.au The questions below come from our project evaluation form, and may help prompt your feedback on particular aspects of our activities, but don't feel bound by them, we are very happy to receive your thoughts - brief or extensive - in any form you like. So too, let us know if you would like to have your thoughts included on our Guestbook. Along with feedback on our courses, at CDI we also really like just hearing about what our past students and project participants are up to. So if you have a new exciting job or promotion, or a great project you are working on, or anything else of interest, please drop us a line directly to cdi@anu.edu.au and we'd be very happy to include your news on our new Alumni Update page. Finally, CDI treats all feedback with sensitivity, and anonymous submissions are very welcome. Many thanks, CDI

Content and Structure: Which statement most describes how you feel about the structure of the activity:
	The right amount of information was provided during the workshop
	There was too much information provided in a short period of time, the program was too full
	There could have been a few more information sessions included in the program
	The program for the workshop was not full enough, many more sessions should have been included
eee
Which statement most describes how you feel about the content of the activity:
	The content of the program was extremely relevant and useful to my work
	Most of the content was relevant and useful to my work
	Some of the content was relevant and useful to my work
	None of the content was relevant or useful to my work
eee
Which aspects of the activity did you find to be the most useful?
eee
Which aspects of the activity did you find to be the least useful?
eee
Are there any topics or themes that were not covered in theactivity that you would have liked to have been included?
eee
Facilitation: Which statement most describes how you feel about the delivery of the activity sessions:
	All of the sessions were clear and comprehensive, the information was very easy to understand
	Most of the sessions were clear and comprehensive, the information was quite easy to understand
	Some of the information sessions were clear and comprehensive, but there were some areas that were difficult to understand
	Most of the sessions were not clear enough and the concepts discussed were difficult to understand
eee
Was there enough opportunity to ask the facilitators and speakers questions about information provided or clarification of concepts?
eee
Was there enough opportunity during the activity to discuss with other participants issues of common interest and concern?
eee
Was the balance between session presentations and discussion groups appropriate?
eee
Can you make any suggestions for improvement of the activity?
eee
Outcomes and future initiatives: How would you rate the activity overall?
	Excellent
	Good
	Satisfactory
	Poor
eee
How will the information, experiences and discussion during the workshop assist you in your work?
eee
What type of workshops or other activities do you think would be most valuable for CDI to undertake in the future to build on the outcomes of this activity and/or engage other issues in the area of strengthening Parliamentary governance and Political parties? All suggestions are very welcome and feel free to comment on all aspects of possible future activity that you feel would be of value to your work, i.e. workshop themes, structures, location, number and type of participants and facilitators, timing, venues etc.
eee